|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Rainwater Harvesting and Artificial Recharge |
Top |
|
| |
| Rainwater harvesting is practiced since historic
times all over the world and in India too. There are many forts and
prestigious ancient buildings where the emergency and routine water
requirements were met from the rainwater harvesting. Of late, due
to spread of the piped water supply policy in urban pockets and later
in rural pockets too, the rainwater harvesting culture vanished except
at few regions like arid and hilly areas. Growing population and increasing
consumerism has put heavy pressure on the water supply schemes. Per
capita consumption of water has increased with time and water requirements
for agriculture, industrial and recreational needs have also increased
with the same pace. |
|
|
|
| |
| Diminishing Water Resources Country's
Biggest Challenge |
Top |
|
| |
|
| |
| In India water demand is increasing year after year.
In year 1997-98, water demand was 629 km3 / year which is projected
to be 1180 km3 / year in year 2050.The growth in population has reduced
the per capita availability of water, which was around 5000 cubic metre during pre-independence
period of the country. Due to further growth
in population, it is projected that per capita water availability
would be less than 1000 cubic metre in year 2050 and country would
be in the water stressed category. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Ground water irrigation has provided social
equity and poverty reduction. Poor farmers are better represented
than rich farmers as regards to ground water utilisation. Small and
marginal farmers represent around 29% of agricultural areas whereas
they account for 35% to 38% of the net areas irrigated by dug wells and
tube/borewells. Ground water has therefore emerged as a tool for poverty
reduction in rural India. It has also helped in removing the regional
disparity of agricultural production. The special agricultural strategy
launched for eastern India comprising eastern UP, Bihar, West Bengal,
Assam, Orissa and Eastern Madhya Pradesh in 1980 relied on ground
water development. Rice production in this region increased rapidly.
West Bengal and Bihar registered fastest growth in rice production.
India became the second largest rice exporter by exporting 5 million tonns
in 1995-96. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Excessive development of ground water resources
has
led to decline in ground water level and yield resulting in water
scarcity in many parts of the country. In these areas total amount of ground water utilised by the human beings exceed the amount of replenishment occurring
under the normal recharge conditions. Threat to ground water
sustainability has occurred at many places. Ground water storage in
these areas depleted leaving the aquifers dry or nearly dry. Every year,
the list of such areas is increasing, forcing the planners and the
concerned fraternity to look into this aspect with all seriousness. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Rainwater Harvesting and Artificial Recharge
- The Need of The Hour |
Top |
|
| |
|
| |
| Rainwater harvesting is practiced to for augmenting
the water supply, and involves catching and storing the rainwater
through appropriate technique of collection, transportation, filtration,
storage and utilisation. Thoughtful planning based on scientific considerations
and common sense and related factors are must for the techno-economically
feasible design of rainwater harvesting schemes acceptable to the
common man. The rainfall, geology, physiography, land use, climatic
conditions and social set up are the basic factors to be understood
by the rainwater harvesters to choose the proper technique of rainwater
management in a particular set up identified by them. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Study of rainfall pattern, amount and intensity,
nature and type of catchment area (roof, garden, paved areas,
storm water drains), topography and physiography of the area are mainly
taken into consideration. However, understanding of the geological set
up and behaviour of the ground water level have major role in selecting
the areas feasible for rainwater harvesting. Disposition of geological
strata below the ground surface is understood to estimate the underground
storage space availability. The deeper water level indicates the higher
scope of rainwater harvesting for artificial recharge to ground water.
Occurrence of very deep ground water levels suggests to use bore wells/tube
wells as recharge structures instead of dug-well. Small catchments
are preferred for rainwater harvesting so as to have a better control
in maintaining the cleanliness. The roof top rainwater is comparatively
pure and clean and requires nominal filtration. However the storm
water harvesting in garden, open premises whether cemented/grass covered,
roadsides etc., require proper filtration before recharging. The quality of storm water must be taken into consideration,
as impure and polluted water if harvested and used for recharge would
pose serious health hazard. The steep slopes, hilly areas, river bank
areas, plane and undulatory terrains need site specific strategy of
either storage option or ground water recharging option. The climatic
set up like arid, semi arid, humid, tropic, sub tropic etc., also
suggest to choose the type of storage. The underground storage is preferred
in arid/semi arid areas to avoid high evaporation. Land use factor
indicates that land availability for construction of large reservoir
is a major problem in densely populated urban pockets. Reservoirs for recharging the ground water therefore need to be constructed
at the outskirts, and underground sumps and recharge through the existing
water supply wells should be emphasised. Similarly combination of
physiography and geology may lead to selection of different options
of rainwater storage. The addition of rainfall factor into it would
further change the type and method of rainwater harvesting selected
otherwise. The demand of water and period of scarcity is also considered
in planning and designing of rainwater storage structures. The social
acceptance and economics and availability of land are main human factors,
which influence the planning of rainwater harvesting and must be addressed
properly along with scientific factors. |
|
| |
|
| |
| The individually owned as well as community controlled
rainwater-harvesting schemes are required in urban areas. The success
of such schemes depends upon the people’s participation. The
appropriate, convenient and easy to operate schemes would be accepted
automatically. Motivation and proper training of women and youth would
be required in immediate future to ensure people’s participation
in managing and operating the rainwater harvesting schemes. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Principal artificial
recharge structures feasible in the state are percolation tanks, cement
plugs and recharge shafts. Other structures can be constructed for
soil conservation, moisture restoration, ground water conservation
and runoff conservation. These would help in recharging the ground
water also. These structures therefore, have secondary role as far
as artificial recharge to ground water is concerned. |
|
|
|
| |
| Master Plan for Artificial Recharge to Ground
Water |
Top |
|
|
| |
|
| |
The State of Maharashtra
falls in four major river basins namely the Godavari (49%), Krishna (22.6%),
Tapi-Purna (16.7%) and Coastal
tract. These basins represent varied hydrogeology, rainfall and agroclimatic
features. Considering the size of basins, Godavari and Krishna
are further subdivided
into smaller sub-basins. The plan for artificial
recharge is prepared considering the hydrogeological parameters and
hydrological data base. The steps adopted in preparation of the plan
are as follows. |
|
| |
|
| |
Identification and prioritization of need
based areas for artificial recharge to ground water. |
| |
Estimation of sub-surface storage space
and quantity of water needed to saturate the unsaturated zone (up to 3 m
bgl) |
| |
| Quantification of surface
water requirement and surplus annual run-off availability of source
for artificial recharge in each sub-basin. |
|
| |
| Working out design
of suitable recharge structures, their numbers, type, storage capacity
and efficiency considering the estimated storage space and available
resource. |
|
| |
Cost estimates of artificial recharge structures
required to be constructed in identified areas. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The methodology adopted for preparing
the plan for the artificial recharge is presented below. |
| |
| 1.
Data Preparation:The base map on 1:2,000,000 scale showing
administrative boundary upto Taluka level, sub-basin boundaries along
with prominent drainage is prepared. A decadal average DTW (showing
the different ranges of DTW at 3 m intervals) map based on Hydrograph
Station data for post monsoon period is prepared and superimposed
and then transferred the data on the above base map. Over the map,
the post monsoon water level trend map showing ranges of water level
rise and fall trend was superimposed. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2.
Identification of Feasible Areas: Based on three layered information
mentioned above the area feasible for artificial recharge have been
demarcated into 4 categories as follows: |
|
| |
|
| |
Areas showing water level between 3 and
6 m bgl and also declining trend (>0.10 m/year) |
| |
Area showing water level between 6-9 m
bgl and also declining trend (>0.10 m/year) |
| |
Water level between 6 and 9 m bgl and
also declining trend (<0.10 m/year). |
| |
Water level more than 9 m bgl, |
| |
|
| |
| The areas of above
4 categories are demarcated on base map and are plani-metered and
respective areas are identified as feasible for artificial recharge to
ground water in order of preference, if required. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 3.
Watersheds Identified for Artificial Recharge: The Maharashtra
state has been divided into 1505 watersheds. The areas identified
for artificial recharge measures have been compiled into watersheds,
talukas and districts. Total 422 watersheds have been identified in
the master plan for artificial recharge, out of which some of the
watersheds are in parts. The list of watersheds pertaining to each
district of the state is given in Appendix 1. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 4.
Estimation of Available Storage Space: The thickness of available
unsaturated zone (below 3 m bgl) of above 4 categories is estimated
by considering the different ranges of water level. The different
range of DTW at 3m interval are averaged to arrive at thickness of
unsaturated zone effectively. |
|
| |
|
| |
| The total volume of
unsaturated strata is calculated by considering the above categories
and unsaturated thickness of different ranges. This volume was then
multiplied by average specific yield
on area specific basis to arrive at the net amount of water required
which is to be recharged by artificial recharge to saturate the aquifer
up to 3 m bgl. (refer Table 1) |
|
| |
Table -1: Estimated
Sub-surface Storage Potential of Vadose Zone through Artificial Recharge
To Ground Water (Post Monsoon Season)
|
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
NAME OF THE BASIN
|
NAME OF THE SUB-BASIN
|
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA (sq.km)
|
AREA INDENTIFIED FOR ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE (sq.km)
|
VOLUME OF UNSATURATED ZONE (MCM)
|
AVERAGE SPECIFIC YIELD
|
TOTAL STORAGE POTENTIAL AS VOLUME OF WATER(MCM)
|
|
1
|
GODAVARI
|
G-1 Upper Godavari
G-2 Pravara
G-3 Purna
G-4 Manjra
|
71666
|
25922
|
70833
|
0.02
|
1417
|
|
2
|
|
G-7 Penganga
|
21870
|
1840
|
2760
|
0.02
|
55
|
|
3
|
|
G-8 Wardha
|
21645
|
6094
|
22821
|
0.02
|
456
|
|
4
|
|
G-9 Wainganga
|
30091
|
4920
|
9540
|
0.015
|
143
|
|
5
|
|
G-10 & G-11 Indravati
|
5822
|
140
|
630
|
0.015
|
9
|
| |
Sub total
|
|
151094
|
38916
|
106584
|
|
2080
|
|
6
|
|
K-154 16 Upper Krishna
|
-
|
560
|
1240
|
0.02
|
25
|
|
7
|
|
K-17213 Upper Bhima
|
-
|
1294
|
3375
|
0.02
|
68
|
|
8
|
|
K-19 (Sinna-Bori)
|
-
|
4998
|
13809
|
0.02
|
276
|
| |
Sub total
|
|
69420
|
6852
|
18424
|
|
369
|
|
9
|
|
Hard rock
|
38550
|
5899
|
37579
|
0.02
|
752
|
|
10
|
|
Tapi alluvium
|
5200
|
5200
|
62400
|
0.07
|
4368
|
|
11
|
|
Purna Alluvium
|
7500
|
7500
|
51000
|
0.07
|
3570
|
| |
Sub total
|
|
51250
|
18599
|
150979
|
|
8690
|
|
12
|
|
|
31650
|
900
|
5658
|
0.02
|
133
|
|
13
|
|
|
1540
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
-
|
NIL
|
| |
Total
|
|
304954
|
65267
|
281645
|
|
11252
|
|
| |
| 5.
Surface Water Requirement: After assessing the actual volume
of water required for saturating the vadose zone, the actual requirement
of source water is to be estimated. Based on the experience gained
in the field experiments, an average recharge efficiency of 75% of
the individual structure is only possible. Therefore, to arrive at
the total volume of actual source water required at the surface, the
volume of water required for artificial recharge calculated at step
No. 7 is now to be multiplied by 1.33 (i.e. reciprocal of 0.75). (refer
Col. No.4 and Col. No. 5 of Table No.2) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 6.
Source Water Availability: The surface water resources available
in various basins and sub basins were based on information provided
by state government. The data available for each sub basin includes
committed runoff, reserve for future planning and surplus water available.
The availability of source water was worked out by adding the amount
of surface water provided for future planning and surplus available.
This availability so worked out is for the entire sub-basin and not
for the requirement of the areas identified for artificial recharge
(refer column 4 of table-1). Hence, to account for requirement
of identified area, apportioning of surface water availability was
done. (refer column 6 of Table-2). |
|
| |
|
| |
| 7.
Run-off considered for Artificial Recharge Planning: For planning
the artificial recharge structures in each sub basin of Maharashtra,
the amount of surface water availability and storage volume was matched
to arrive at the feasibility of the scheme (refer column 4 of Table
-3). |
|
| |
|
| |
| Planning of Suitable Recharge Structures |
|
|
| |
Hydrogeologically,
the areas have been broadly grouped into hard rock and alluvial areas.
In hard rock areas i.e. Godavari, Krishna, Coastal basins and part
of Tapi-Purna, the surface spreading techniques consisting of percolation
tanks and cement plugs/bunds are most appropriate. In alluvial areas,
i.e., part of Tapi and Purna basins, the percolation tanks in mountain
fronts and recharge shaft in alluvial/ bazada zone are most appropriate.
Accordingly, these structures have been recommended for artificial
recharge. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Other structures like
contour trenches, gabbian structure, nala bunds, village ponds etc.
may also be taken up side by side which would be more appropriate
for soil and moisture conservation. The under ground bandharas or
sub surface dykes are ground water conservation structures and hence
be taken up a site specific location to conserve the ground water
at appropriate locations. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Table - 2: Requirement
and Availability of Surface Water Resources for Artificial Recharge
to Ground Water In Major Sub-basins of Maharashtra |
|
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
SUB. BASIN
|
AREA IDENTIFIED FOR ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE (Sq.km)
|
SUB SURFACE STORAGE POTENTIAL (MCM)
|
SURFACE WATER REQUIREMENT RECIPROCAL OF (75% efficiency)
(MCM)
|
PROPORTIONATE NON COMMITTED WATER RESOURCES(AVAILABLE
AS SURPLUS/KEPT FOR FUTURE PLANNING (MCM)
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
| |
A) GODAVARI BASIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Upper Godavari (G1 to G4)
|
25922
|
1417
|
1889
|
269
|
|
2
|
Penganga (G-7)
|
1840
|
55
|
73
|
40
|
|
3
|
Wardha (G-8)
|
6094
|
456
|
608
|
203
|
|
4
|
Wainganga (G-9)
|
4920
|
143
|
191
|
589
|
|
5
|
Indravati (G-10 & G-11)
|
140
|
9
|
12
|
8
|
| |
Sub-total
|
38916
|
2080
|
2773
|
1109
|
| |
B) KRISHNA
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Upper Krishna K-15 and K-16
|
560
|
25
|
33
|
366
|
|
7
|
Upper Bhima K-17 & K-18
|
1294
|
68
|
91
|
174
|
|
8
|
Sinna & Bori K-19
|
4998
|
276
|
368
|
558
|
| |
Sub total
|
6852
|
369
|
492
|
1098
|
| |
C) TAPI-PURNA
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Hard rock
|
5899
|
752
|
1003
|
305
|
|
10
|
Tapi alluvium
|
5200
|
4368
|
5824
|
270
|
|
11
|
Purna alluvium
|
7500
|
3570
|
4760
|
389
|
| |
Sub total
|
18599
|
8690
|
11587
|
964
|
| |
D) COASTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
BASIN
|
900
|
113
|
151
|
Adequate
|
|
13
|
NARMADA
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
NIL
|
-
|
| |
TOTAL
|
65267
|
11252
|
15003
|
3171
|
|
| |
Table 3: Plan of Artificial
Recharge to Ground Water by Suitable Principal Recharge Schemes using
Surface Water Resources.
|
| |
|
S.NO
|
NAME OF THE BASIN
|
NAME OF THE SUB BASIN
|
AMOUNT OF SURFACEWATER CONSIDERED FOR PLANNINGARTIFICIAL
RECHARGE TO GROUND WATER MCM
|
RESOURSES TO BE HARNESSED BY
|
ESTIMATED COST OF STRUCTURES(CRORES)
|
|
PERCOLATION TANKS (AVERAGE GROSS CAPACITY 200TCM)
|
CEMENT PLUGS (AVERAGE GROSS CAPACITY 30 TCM)
|
RECHARGE SHAFT (30 TCM CAPACITY)
|
PERCOLATION TANKS
|
CEMENT PLUGS
|
RECHARGE SHAFT
|
|
MCM
|
NOS.
|
MCM
|
NOS.
|
MCM
|
NOS.
|
|
1
|
GODAVARI
|
G-1 Upper Godavari
G-2 Pravara
G-3 Purna
G-4 Manjra
|
269
|
188
|
940
|
81
|
2700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
G-7 Penganga
|
40
|
28
|
140
|
12
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
G-8 Wardha
|
203
|
142
|
710
|
61
|
2033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
G-9 Wainganga
|
191
|
134
|
670
|
57
|
1900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
G-9 Wainganga
|
8
|
5
|
25
|
3
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sub Total
|
|
711
|
497
|
2485
|
214
|
7133
|
|
|
497
|
143
|
--
|
|
6
|
KRISHNA
|
K-154 16 Upper Krishna
|
33
|
23
|
115
|
10
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
K-17213 Upper Bhima
|
91
|
64
|
320
|
27
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
K-19 (Sinna-Bori)
|
368
|
258
|
1290
|
110
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sub Total
|
|
492
|
345
|
1725
|
147
|
4899
|
|
|
345
|
98
|
--
|
|
9
|
TAPI-PURNA
|
Hard Rock
|
305
|
213
|
1065
|
92
|
3066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Tapi Alluvium
|
270
|
189
|
945
|
--
|
--
|
81
|
1350
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Purna Alluvium
|
389
|
272
|
1360
|
--
|
--
|
117
|
1950
|
|
|
|
| |
Sub Total
|
|
964
|
674
|
3370
|
92
|
3066
|
198
|
2300
|
674
|
61
|
46
|
|
12
|
Coastal Basin
|
|
151
|
106
|
528
|
45
|
1500
|
|
|
106
|
30
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
2318
|
1622
|
528
|
498
|
16598
|
198
|
2300
|
1622
|
332
|
46
|
|
| |
· Total cost of Principal recharge
schemes is 2000 crores |
| |
|
| |
| 1.
Storage Capacity of Recharge Structures: The storage capacity
of recharge structure was worked out based on the findings of various
artificial recharge studies under taken in Maharashtra for planning
the future storage capacity of considered schemes. |
|
| |
|
| |
A percolation tank
of 100 Thousand Cubic Metre (TCM) capacity (single filling) will actually
store 200% more due to multiple fillings during monsoon. This will
have gross storage capacity of 200 TCM.
|
|
| |
A cement plugs of 10
TCM capacity (single filling) will actually store 300% more due to
multiple filling in monsoon. This will provide gross storage of 30
TCM for cement plugs.
|
|
| |
A recharge shaft on an average will recharge
1 TCM/day with 60 operational days during monsoon and post monsoon. |
| |
|
| |
2.
Number of Recharge Structures: The number of recharge structures
required to store and recharge the ground water reservoir have been
worked out as follows:
|
|
| |
Total
surface water considered (column 4 of Table 3)
No. of structures = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
gross capacity of PT/CP (considering multiple fillings)
|
| |
The amount of surface
water considered for planning the artificial recharge is 2318 MCM.
Based on the field situation it has been considered that 70% storage
would be through percolation tank and remaining by check dams and
recharge shafts. Accordingly 70% of it, i.e., 1622 MCM, will be stored
in percolation tanks, 498 MCM will be stored in Cement plugs/check
dams and 198 MCM through recharge shafts. Therefore, 8108 percolation
tanks, 16598 cement plugs/check dams and 5600 recharge shafts are
proposed in the identified areas of Maharashtra. The percolation tanks
should be constructed on second and third order drainage, on favorable
hydrogeological and physiographical locations. The cement plugs can
be constructed on any order of drainage in hard rock areas. The density
of structures per sq. km is to be planned realistically to make it
implementable on practical considerations.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| The cost estimate for
principal artificial recharge schemes viz. percolation tank, cement
plug and recharge shaft and for other secondary schemes viz. nala
bund, contour trenches, gabbian structures, underground dykes etc.
are worked out as follows: |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1.
Principal Schemes: Based on the experiences gained from centrally
sector artificial recharge studies, it is observed that the cost of
recharge schemes depends upon the specific situations. At present
the average cost of construction of a PT (100 TCM single filling
storage capacity) is around Rs. 20 lakhs. The cost of cement plugs or masonry
check dam of 10 TCM single filling capacity is Rs. 3 lakhs. The
average cost of one recharge shaft is Rs. 2 lakhs. Therefore, an expenditure
of Rs. 2,000 crores is estimated to undertake the constructions of
proposed recharge structures. The unit cost of storing the water in
percolation tanks and cement plugs is worked out as Rs. 11956/- per
TCM. The unit cost of recharge from recharge shaft is worked out as
Rs. 4166/- per TCM. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2.
Secondary Schemes: The secondary schemes which are indirectly
augmenting the ground water are also acting as water and soil conservation
measures e.g. nala bunds, contour trenching, gabbian structure, Kolhapur
type weirs and village tanks etc., alongwith under ground dykes and
fracture cement sealing are also recommended. The numbers and size
of these minute structures be specified in the master plan
of state level. Therefore, a tentative provision of 25% of the cost
expenditure on principal scheme is recommended. Therefore, Rs. 500 crores is provided for these schemes. |
|
| |
|
| |
| The plan of artificial
recharge in the first phase will therefore involve a total expenditure
of Rs. 2500/- crores (2000 + 500 crores). |
|
| |
|
| |
| Area to be benefitted from Recharge Impact |
|
|
| |
The impact of artificial
recharge to ground water shall be created mainly at the down stream
side of recharge structures. This area will normally be maximum during
the end of monsoon and a distinct rise in ground water level will
be observed as compared to other areas not receiving the additional
recharge. It estimated that the maximum influence of recharge schemes
proposed in Master Plan will be distinctly observed in around 15600
Sq. Km. area at the monsoon period. A rise of 2 to 5m in water level
shall be observed depending upon the quantity of recharge and variation
in specific yield. This will also result in saving of energy, as the
suction lift of pump sets would be reduced by 2 to 5m.
|
|
| |
|
| |
| Additional Land to be brought under Irrigation |
|
|
| |
The impact of
artificial recharge although will be witnessed in around 15600 sq.
km., the
entire area will not be brought under assured irrigation. Therefore
the calculation of additional area to be brought under assured irrigation
from the proposed recharge schemes has been done. Considering the
prevailing cropping pattern the Delta factor of 0.5 m/year is adopted
for further calculations.
|
|
| |
|
| |
| It is estimated that
a total of 5,336,00 ha. additional land can be brought under assured
irrigation during Rabi & Kharif seasons. The scheme wise additional
irrigation from percolation tanks, cement plugs, recharge shafts and
supplementary schemes would be 3,23,300 ha., 74,700 ha., 35,600 ha.
and around 1,00,000 ha. respectively. This will also provide sustainability
to the ground water round the year and dependability on tanker water
supply will be reduced significantly in proposed areas. |
|
| |
|
| |
Feasibility of Artificial Recharge in
Urban Areas |
| |
|
| |
| Urban Water Supply
is one of the core issues to the civic authorities of the state. In
order to cater to the need of ever growing demand of safe drinking
and domestic water supply, the ground water based supply is the most
dependable alternative. Every household prefers to construct a dug
well or bore well in their premises. However, its sustainability specially
in hard rock formation is a problem during the summer and drought
years. The ground water resources are under stress in many urban areas
due to shrinkage of recharge area caused by sudden spurt in constructional
activities and ashaphalting of roads etc. The un-abashed and un-planned
development of ground water is witnessed in urban peripheries and
unauthorized / illegal layouts causing environmental degradation and
lowering of water levels. |
|
| |
|
| |
| In view of above, there
is a need to augment the ground water recharge in feasible areas of
the urban centers. Artificial recharge, therefore is needed to enhance
the ground water availability which will be a positive approach for
the sustainable water supply round the year. Considering the over
all demographic, climatic, hydrogeological, physiographic and socio-economic
set up of the urban areas, following schemes are proposed for ground
water augmentation through artificial recharge techniques. |
|
| |
|
| |
1. Roof-top rainwater harvesting. |
| |
2. Runoff rainwater conservation. |
| |
|
| |
| These schemes are feasible
in densely populated urban pockets where land availability for construction
of tanks/reservoirs etc. is almost non-existent. There are 349 urban
towns in 30 districts covering about 6214.3 sq. km of the state. The
state has three metropolitan cities namely Mumbai, Pune and Nagpur
covering about 15% of urban area of the state. There are 9 municipal
corporations and 228 municipalities in the state. The urban population
density varies from 751 persons per sq. km in Satara to 16,432 persons
per sq. km in Mumbai. |
|
| |
|
| |
The district wise statistics
of urban areas of Maharashtra is given in Table 4. There are 53,25,000 pucca houses in use in the state as per 1991 census.
|
| |
Table 4: District Wise Statistics of Urban
Areas in Maharashtra State (1991 Census) |
| |
|
Sl.NO.
|
NAME OF DISTRICT
|
NOS. OF URBAN TOWN
|
TOTAL URBAN AREA OS TOWN(SQ. KM)
|
TOTAL POPULATION DENSITY (PER SQ. KM.)
|
NO. OF HOUSES IN USE
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
1
|
Mumbai
|
1
|
603
|
16432
|
15, 00,000
|
|
2
|
Thane
|
23
|
232.4
|
14600
|
730,000
|
|
3
|
Raigarh
|
19
|
133.3
|
2463
|
67000
|
|
4
|
Ratnagiri
|
8
|
80.4
|
1717
|
26,000
|
|
5
|
Sindhudurga
|
4
|
29.5
|
2141
|
13000
|
|
6
|
Nasik
|
17
|
344.4
|
3975
|
243000
|
|
7
|
Dhule
|
17
|
101.9
|
5101
|
88000
|
|
8
|
Jalgaon
|
17
|
182.46
|
4794
|
157000
|
|
9
|
Ahmednagar
|
13
|
391.5
|
1360
|
99000
|
|
10
|
Pune
|
34
|
621
|
4520
|
565000
|
|
11
|
Solapur
|
10
|
414
|
5442
|
163000
|
|
12
|
Satara
|
10
|
354
|
751
|
50000
|
|
13
|
Sangli
|
8
|
299.9
|
1675
|
95000
|
|
14
|
Kilhapur
|
12
|
191.7
|
4105
|
146000
|
|
15
|
Aurangabad
|
8
|
106.1
|
6835
|
131000
|
|
16
|
Jalna
|
4
|
34.5
|
6688
|
39000
|
|
17
|
Beed
|
7
|
234.9
|
1392
|
58000
|
|
18
|
Latur
|
5
|
74.6
|
4583
|
57000
|
|
19
|
Osmanabad
|
8
|
241.4
|
803
|
34000
|
|
20
|
Nanded
|
13
|
211.1
|
2398
|
13000
|
|
21
|
Parbhani
|
11
|
220.7
|
2156
|
80000
|
|
22
|
Buldana
|
11
|
58.5
|
6672
|
68000
|
|
23
|
Akola
|
10
|
150.0
|
4243
|
110000
|
|
24
|
Amravati
|
11
|
160.0
|
4488
|
133000
|
|
25
|
Yavatmal
|
10
|
68.00
|
5249
|
66000
|
|
26
|
Wardha
|
6
|
29.8
|
9467
|
54000
|
|
27
|
Nagpur
|
28
|
331.2
|
6132
|
370000
|
|
28
|
Bhandara
|
8
|
73.08
|
3777
|
54000
|
|
29
|
Chandrapur
|
12
|
174
|
2855
|
102000
|
|
30
|
Gadchiroli
|
4
|
66.1
|
1036.82
|
14000
|
| |
Total
|
349
|
6214.34
|
137850
|
5325000
|
|
| |
|
| |
| The statistics of 30
major cities which are districts headquarters is given in Table 5.
These cities have 2046.3 sq. km of urban areas and there are 35,49,000
houses in use in these cities (1991 census). |
|
| |
|
| |
| Roof-Top Rainwater Availability - Approach
Adopted |
|
|
| |
The assessment of roof
top rainwater availability has been done on the basis of roof top
area and normal rainfall both during monsoon and non-monsoon period
by multiplying a factor to take care of losses due to various reasons. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1.
Roof-Top Area: The data regarding number of houses in towns,
district and divisional headquarters has formed the basis of calculation
of roof top area. The exact size of individual house is not available,
therefore an average roof size is adopted as 50 sq. metre for calculation
of roof area. |
|
| |
|
| |
| The roof area of urban
towns of each district is calculated as given in Table 6. The total
urban roof area in Maharashtra works out to be 266.25 sq. km. which
is 4.3% of the total urban geographical area. The roof area of 30
district headquarters is 177.25 sq.Km. which is 8.7% of the corresponding
geographical area of these district headquarter. The roof top area
in 3 metropolitan cities of the state is 10.2 % of their geographical
areas. The statistics of 30 major cities are given inTable 7. |
|
| |
|
| |
| 2.
Rainwater availability from Roof-Top: The estimation of water
available from roof top harvesting is worked out by multiplying the
roof area with normal rainfall data available for monsoon period.
The details of district wise roof water availability works out to
be as 290.8 MCM during monsoon and 12 MCM during non-monsoon periods.
Table 7 indicates the rainwater availability at district headquarters
during monsoon ( June - September ) as 194.4 MCM and during non monsoon
(November - March ) as 7.3 MCM. |
|
| |
|
| |
| The above quantity
of Rainwater is received at roof top, but same is not available down
the roof due to various losses in the form of moisture absorption,
evaporation losses and leakage etc. Therefore, 90% of the above figure
is considered available for harvesting the rainwater which will be
taken as source for artificial recharge to ground water at feasible
locations. |
|
| |
|
| |
Table 5: Statistics of Major Urban Areas
in Maharashtra |
| |
|
Sr.No.
|
NAME OF DISTRICT
|
URBAN AREA OF DISTRICT HQ (SQ. KM.)
|
TOTAL POPULATION DENSITY
(PER SQ. KM.)
|
NO. OF HOUSES IN USE
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
1
|
Mumbai
|
603
|
16432
|
1500000
|
|
2
|
Thane
|
86.7
|
14883
|
287000
|
|
3
|
Raigarh
|
14.8
|
1638
|
5000
|
|
4
|
Ratnagiri
|
10.5
|
5384
|
11000
|
|
5
|
Sindhudurga
|
4.5
|
2578
|
2000
|
|
6
|
Nasik
|
177.1
|
4119
|
144000
|
|
7
|
Dhule
|
46.1
|
5985
|
47000
|
|
8
|
Jalgaon
|
62.29
|
3888
|
45000
|
|
9
|
Ahmednagar
|
31.8
|
6909
|
48000
|
|
10
|
Pune
|
166
|
10404
|
342000
|
|
11
|
Solapur
|
33.11
|
18249
|
107000
|
|
12
|
Satara
|
8
|
10213
|
16000
|
|
13
|
Sangli
|
84.2
|
4320
|
68000
|
|
14
|
Kolhapur
|
67.2
|
6228
|
55000
|
|
15
|
Aurangabad
|
50.5
|
11737
|
108000
|
|
16
|
Jalna
|
25.9
|
6756
|
30000
|
|
17
|
Beed
|
8.3
|
546
|
20000
|
|
18
|
Latur
|
7.1
|
27808
|
35000
|
|
19
|
Osmanabad
|
11.2
|
6073
|
12000
|
|
20
|
Nanded
|
27.1
|
11929
|
51000
|
|
21
|
Parbhani
|
63.4
|
3456
|
38000
|
|
22
|
Buldana
|
9
|
5883
|
10000
|
|
23
|
Akola
|
21
|
15710
|
59000
|
|
24
|
Amravati
|
53
|
7901
|
81000
|
|
25
|
Yavatmal
|
10
|
12182
|
23000
|
|
26
|
Wardha
|
8
|
12878
|
20000
|
|
27
|
Nagpur
|
217.6
|
7468
|
293000
|
|
28
|
Bhandara
|
16.83
|
4278
|
13000
|
|
29
|
Chandrapur
|
93
|
3771
|
72000
|
|
30
|
Gadchiroli
|
29.1
|
1015.8
|
7000
|
| |
Total
|
2046.33
|
|
3549000
|
|
| |
|
| |
Table 6: Roof-Top Rainwater Availability
in Urban Area in Maharashtra State (District wise) |
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
NAME OF DISTRICT
|
TOTAL ROOF AREA (sq. km)
|
VOLUME OF Rainwater ON ROOF TOP (TCM)
|
GENERAL DTW RANGE (m bgl)
|
AQUIFER
|
|
MONSOON
|
NON-MONSOON
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
1
|
Mumbai
|
75.0
|
104475
|
2055
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
2
|
Thane
|
36.50
|
65992
|
927.1
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
3
|
Raigarh
|
3.35
|
6043.4
|
86.09
|
<3.0
|
Basalt & Laterites
|
|
4
|
Ratnagiri
|
1.30
|
3166.8
|
55.51
|
3.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt & Laterites
|
|
5
|
Sindhudurga
|
0.65
|
1504.75
|
37.3
|
3.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt & Laterites
|
|
6
|
Nasik
|
12.15
|
8019
|
639.09
|
3.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt
|
|
7
|
Dhule
|
4.40
|
2270.4
|
183.04
|
6.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
8
|
Jalgaon
|
7.85
|
5424.35
|
3575.96
|
3.0 to 40.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
9
|
Ahmednagar
|
4.95
|
2351.25
|
285.61
|
6.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt
|
|
10
|
Pune
|
28.25
|
14209.75
|
1146.95
|
3.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt
|
|
11
|
Solapur
|
8.15
|
4205.4
|
456.4
|
3.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt
|
|
12
|
Satara
|
2.50
|
2067.5
|
159.75
|
3.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt
|
|
13
|
Sangli
|
4.75
|
1705.25
|
237.5
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
14
|
Kolhapur
|
7.30
|
5540.7
|
414.64
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
15
|
Aurangabad
|
6.55
|
3936.55
|
364.83
|
6.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
16
|
Jalna
|
1.95
|
1011.85
|
52.06
|
6.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
17
|
Beed
|
2.90
|
1603.7
|
171.39
|
3.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt
|
|
18
|
Latur
|
2.85
|
2653.06
|
67.54
|
6.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt
|
|
19
|
Osmanabad
|
1.70
|
1137.3
|
82.62
|
6.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt
|
|
20
|
Nanded
|
6.50
|
5063.5
|
378.3
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt & Crystalline
|
|
21
|
Parbhani
|
4.00
|
2820.0
|
286.0
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
22
|
Buldana
|
3.40
|
1485.8
|
233.24
|
3.0 to 15.0
|
Basalt
|
|
23
|
Akola
|
5.50
|
3767.5
|
349.8
|
3.0 to 18.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
24
|
Amravati
|
6.65
|
4934.3
|
4565.85
|
3.0 to 18.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
25
|
Yavatmal
|
3.30
|
3052.25
|
232.98
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt & sedimentary
|
|
26
|
Wardha
|
2.70
|
2632.5
|
192.78
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt, Crystalline & Sedimentary
|
|
27
|
Nagpur
|
18.5
|
19776.5
|
1504.05
|
3.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt, sedimentary & Crystalline
|
|
28
|
Bhandara
|
2.70
|
3304.8
|
235.71
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt, Crystalline & Sedimentary
|
|
29
|
Chandrapur
|
5.10
|
5666.1
|
340.17
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Crystalline & Sedimentary
|
|
30
|
Gadchiroli
|
0.70
|
972.09
|
49.63
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Crystalline
|
| |
Total
|
266.25
|
290793.6
|
12029.89
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7: Roof Top Rainwater Availability
in Urban Area (District HQ) in Maharashtra |
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
NAME OF DISTRICT
|
TOTAL ROOF AREA (sq. km)
|
VOLUME OF Rainwater ON ROOF-TOP (TCM)
|
DTW RANGE (m bgl)
|
AQUIFER
|
|
MONSOON
|
NON-MONSOON
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
1
|
Mumbai
|
75.0
|
104475
|
2055
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
2
|
Thane
|
14.35
|
25944.8
|
364.14
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
3
|
Raigarh
|
0.25
|
451
|
6.42
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
4
|
Ratnagiri
|
0.55
|
1339.8
|
23.48
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
5
|
Sindhudurga
|
0.10
|
231.5
|
4.2
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
6
|
Nasik
|
7.2
|
4752.0
|
378.72
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
7
|
Dhule
|
2.35
|
1212.6
|
97.76
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
8
|
Jalgaon
|
2.25
|
1554.75
|
102.6
|
9.0 to 12.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
9
|
Ahmednagar
|
2.40
|
1140.0
|
138.48
|
6.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
10
|
Pune
|
17.10
|
8601.3
|
694.26
|
1.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
11
|
Solapur
|
5.35
|
2760.6
|
299.6
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
12
|
Satara
|
0.80
|
661.6
|
51.12
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
13
|
Sangli
|
3.40
|
1220.6
|
170.0
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
14
|
Kolhapur
|
2.75
|
2087.25
|
156.2
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
15
|
Aurangabad
|
5.40
|
3245.4
|
300.78
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
16
|
Jalna
|
1.50
|
778.35
|
40.05
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
17
|
Beed
|
1.00
|
553
|
59.10
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
18
|
Latur
|
1.75
|
1629.07
|
41.47
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
19
|
Osmanabad
|
0.60
|
401.4
|
29.16
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
20
|
Nanded
|
2.25
|
1752.75
|
130.95
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
21
|
Parbhani
|
1.90
|
1339.5
|
135.85
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
22
|
Buldana
|
0.50
|
218.5
|
34.3
|
<3.0
|
Basalt
|
|
23
|
Akola
|
2.95
|
2020.75
|
187.62
|
6.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
24
|
Amravati
|
4.05
|
3005.1
|
278.23
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt & Alluvium
|
|
25
|
Yavatmal
|
1.15
|
1066.05
|
81.19
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Basalt
|
|
26
|
Wardha
|
1.00
|
970.50
|
71.4
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt
|
|
27
|
Nagpur
|
14.65
|
15660.85
|
1191.04
|
3.0 to 9.0
|
Basalt Sediment-ary & Crystalline
|
|
28
|
Bhandara
|
0.65
|
795.6
|
56.74
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Crystalline
|
|
29
|
Chandrapur
|
3.60
|
3999.6
|
240.12
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Crystalline
|
|
30
|
Gadchiroli
|
0.35
|
486.04
|
24.81
|
3.0 to 6.0
|
Crystalline
|
| |
Total
|
177.25
|
194359.78
|
7345.14
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| Feasibility of Artificial Recharge in Urban
Areas |
|
|
| |
The feasibility of
artificial recharge in urban areas shall depend upon the sub-surface
storage space available during monsoon period. Therefore the depth
of water level, trend of ground water level and type of aquifers are
considered in identifying the urban areas needing artificial recharge.
The areas having shallow depth to water level i.e. less than 3 mbgl
during post monsoon are not feasible for artificial recharge and have
not been considered. The areas having deeper water level generally
more than 3 m bgl and with declining water levels are considered for
artificial recharge to ground water using source of roof top rainwater
harvesting and runoff water harvesting. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Considering the field
data base of decadal average depth to water level ( 1989-98), a list
of urban areas in each district is prepared as shown in Appendix II
where artificial recharge to groundwater is feasible. However, detailed
survey would be required for each urban area for site specific schemes.
In certain cities only part of their areas shall have feasibility
for artificial recharge through roof top rainwater harvesting. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Cost Estimate for Rainwater Harvesting and
Artificial Recharge in Urban Areas |
|
|
| |
In the state of Maharashtra
around 232 urban areas have been identified for artificial recharge.
The cost estimate of artificial recharge scheme using both the rooftop
rainwater and the storm water runoff from open ground are worked out
as follows. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
1.
Roof-Top Rainwater Schemes:
The number of houses in 232 urban
areas of the state are around 35,14,500 as per 1991 census. The houses
having dug-well or bore-well etc. are targeted for recharging the
ground water reservoir through roof top rainwater harvesting. It is
observed that on an average only 25% of the houses are having their
own well in the premises, which can be utilized for harnessing roof
top Rainwater. The remaining around 8.78 lakhs houses shall be required
to be covered under this scheme wherein well for recharge has to be
constructed. The average cost expenditure for providing the necessary
arrangements through pipe fittings etc. shall cost around Rs. 6000/-
per house. Thus a total cost of Rs. 527/- crores is estimated in the
state for roof top Rainwater recharge. This will ensure the utilization
of 50 MCM of roof top water supply available for artificial recharge
in monsoon and non-monsoon seasons every year.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
2.
Runoff Water Harvesting Schemes:
The rainfall runoff flowing
from the roads and open grounds is substantial during rains. This
water often creates the water logging and the drainage system is put
under stress in the urban agglomerates. This ultimately flows out
of the city unutilized. This water if conserved and utilized properly
for recharging the ground water reservoir may bring much needed relief
to the water scarcity areas of the city. A scheme suitable for artificial
recharge in urban area is prepared by C.G.W.B. and is successfully
implemented and operated at Nagpur Municipal Corporation ground. The
design and plan of the scheme is presented in figure 3. In this scheme
about 15000 sq. m of residential catchment was intercepted and runoff
generated was diverted into the specially constructed recharge well
in the public garden. The runoff water was filtered silt free by providing
a filter pit as shown in fig 3. Number of such locations can be identified
within city areas where such structures may be constructed to provide
a sustainable ground water based water supply in the city.
|
|
| |
|
| |
| It is estimated that
in 232 urban areas of Maharashtra around 3500 schemes would be needed
with an average of 15 schemes per town/city. This will represent over
1 sq. km. of urban area per recharge well. The average cost of the
recharge well, filter pit, pipe line and development of surrounding
space will be around Rs. one lakh. Therefore an expenditure of Rs.35
crores is estimated. Thus total cost of urban recharge schemes shall
be around Rs.527 + 35 i.e. 562 crores. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Benefit of Recharge in Urban Area |
|
|
| |
| The per capita consumption
of water varies from small town to cosmopolitan city between 120 to
270 lits./day/capita. However to calculate the benefit of 45 MCM of
recharge water (90% of roof water) an average of 150 lits/day/person
is considered for the entire urban Maharashtra. It is estimated that
more than 8 lakhs additional population will get adequate domestic
water supply round the year through augmented ground water in Maharashtra.
This will also ensure the sustainability of ground water resources
during the peak demand period of summer. |
|
| |
|
| |
Watersheds identified for Artificial Recharge
in Maharashtra
|
DISTRICT
|
TALUKA
|
WATERSHED
|
|
|
| |
|
1
|
Bhandara
|
Pavni, Arjuni Morgaon. |
WGG-5, WGG-4, WGG-3,
WGM-2,WG-12(F),WGH,WGC-6, WGB(F).
|
|
2
|
Gadchiroli
|
Kulrkheda,Charmosi,Aheri. |
WGB-3,WGM-ST(F),WGKS-3,WGKS-1,
WGK-3,WGKT,PRDI(F),
PRD2(F),PRD,PR-4,PR-3.IVP.
|
|
3
|
Chandrapur
|
Gondpimpri, Mul, Chandrapur,Bhadravati,Warora,Nagbid, Mul. |
WGM-2,WGB,WGAML,WGAM-2(F),
WGAM(F),WGL,WGA-2,WGA-1,
WR-20(FWR-19,WR18,WRD,WR-5,
WR-22,WRE,WRK,WR-2(F),WRE-2,
WR-16,PG-1,PG2.
|
|
4
|
Nagpur
|
Parasivni,Ramtek,Kalmeshwar,Katol,Hingna,Saoner,Narkhed. |
WGKP-1(F),WGKP-4,WGS-1,
WGK-4,WGKP-3(F),
WGKP-2(F),WGK2(F),
WGK-1,WGK5,WGKK3,WRW5,
WRWB-2(F),WRJ-4,WRWBd-1,
WR.2,WRJ-1.
|
|
5
|
Wardha
|
Devli,Selu. |
WRWBd-4,WRWB-1,WRWB-2,WRWBd-2WRWBd-5,WRY-6,WR-7,WR-26(F),WR-25(F).
|
|
6
|
Yavatmal
|
Wani,Maregaon,Kallamb, Babhulgaon &
Yavatmal,Pusad Mahagaon,Digras,Darwah. |
WR-3(F),WR-2,WRB-6,WRB-5,
WRB-5,WRB-3,WRBM,PGA3,
PGAA-1(F),PGAA-2PGAA-3,PGP2,
PGP-5,WR-7,WR-8(F),WRN-2,WRN-1,
P4-12,PGV-2,PGV-1,PG-11,PGV-3.
|
|
7
|
|
Warud,Morshi,Chandur Bazar, Bhatkuli,Achalpur,Anjangaon,Daryapur&
Amravati.
|
WR-1(F),WR-2(F),WR-3,WRG-1,
PTP-4,PTP-3,PTP-5,PTP-2(F),PTP,
PT-20(F),PT-3(F),PTG-3(F),PT-2(F),
PTCS-2(F),PTC-1,PTK-2(F),PTSI,
PTSB-1(F),PTSP(F)
|
|
8
|
|
Akot,Telhara, Akola, Balapur,Murtizapur Washim. |
PGAA-4(F),PGAA-3(F), PGAA-2(F),
PT-4,PT26, PTK-1,PT-19(F),
PT-18,PTS(F),PT-5(F),PTST-1(F),
PTSB-1(F),PT-6(F),
PT-7(F),PTM-1,PT-8(F),PT-4,PT-17.
|
|
9
|
|
Billori,Mukhed,Degloor Hingoli. |
MR-59,MR63,MR-60,MR-61(F),MR-4(F), MR-50,MR-53,MR-65(F),MR-66(F).
|
|
10
|
|
Gangakhed,Basmat,Jintur,Parbhani. |
GP-55,GP-60(F),GP-1,GP-53,GP-54,
GP-49,GP-50(F),GP-51,GP-57,
GP-56(F),GV-89, GV-97A,GV-96,GV-90A.
|
|
11
|
|
Nilanga,Ausa,Latur Ahmadpur. |
GV-56B,GV97B(F),MR-34,MR-28,
MR-27,MR-29,MR-35(F),MR-56,MR-42,
MR-20,MR-26,MR-15(F0,MR-16(F).
|
|
12
|
|
Omarga,Osmanabad,Kallamb,Paranda,Tulzapur. |
MR-17,MR-16(F),MR-8(F),MR-7(F),
MR-10(F),SA-28A,SA-24,MR-9(F),MR-13, MR-18,MR-17,SA-40,SA-39.
|
|
13
|
|
Karmala,Madha,Solapur,Akkalkoat,Mohal. |
SA-41,SA-40,SA-38(F),SA-37,
SA-39(F),SA-36,SA-33(F),SA-34(F),
SA-31,SA-27,SA-22,SA-20,BM-79,
BM-91,BM-90,BM-99BM-89.
|
|
14
|
|
Rajapur,Lanja,Sangameshwar,Ratnagiri,Chiploon. |
WF-71,WF-70,WF-65,WF-67,WF-64,
WF-62,WF-63
|
|
15
|
|
Karad. |
KR-21,KR-20,KR-19.
|
|
16
|
|
Sangamner,ShrirampurParner,Rahuri,AhmadnagarShrigonda,Shegaon,Jamkhed. |
SA-18,SA-11,SA-5,BM-15,SA-4,SA-2,
SA-1GV-116(F),GV-124(F),GV-125,
GV-117,GV-118,GV-123(F),GV-119,
GV-120,GV-111(F),GV-112(F),GV-29B,
GV-25B,GV-22A,GV-110(F),
GV-109(F),GV-108(F),GV-106(F),
GV-114(F),GV-113(F),GV-115(F),
GV-137,GV-128,GV-134,
|
|
17
|
|
Sinnar,Kalwan,Balgaon. |
GV-16,GV-8,GV-15,TE-127,TE-108,
TE-26,TE-107,TE-116,TE-125,TE-92,
TE-106.
|
|
18
|
|
Beed,Gevrai,Kaij,Ambajogari. |
GV-64(F),GV-67(F),GV-68,GV-69,
GV-62,MR-6,MR-8,MR-18,MR-25,
MR-14,MR-3B,GV-97B,GV,GV-72.
|
|
19
|
|
In parts,Sangrampur,Jalgaon,
Nandura,Shegaon,Balapur,Malkapur,KhamgaonTaluka. |
PTM-1,PTMB(F),PTGB-1,PTMM,
PTG1M-1(F),PTG,PTG-5,
PTG1D-1(F),PTG1-1(F),PT-9(F),
PT-10,PT-11,PT-12,PTV-5(F),PTV-2(F),
PTV-1,PTN-2,PT-(F),PTN-1,PT-13(F).
|
|
20
|
|
Jalna,Ambad,Bhokardhan,Jafrabad Taluka. |
GP-18A,GPD-1,GPD-2,GPD-3,GP-27(F), GP-32A(F),GP-12(F),GP-13(F),GP-5(F),
GP-6(F),GP-14(F),GP-20(F),GP-19(F),
GP-22(F),GP-8(F),GP-23(F),GP-21(F),
GP-29(F),GP-32B(F),GP-21(F),GP-24(F),
GP-16(F),GP-17(F),GP-26,GP-25,GP-31, GV-68,GV-54(F),GV-55,GP-31.
|
|
21
|
|
Aurangabad,Khultabad,Kannad,Sillod,Vaizapur,Gangapur,Paithan,Soygaon. |
GV-53,GV-52(F),GV-52A(F),GV-51(A),
GV-51(F),GV-48,GV-47(F),GV-42(F),
GV-37,GV-(F),GV-33B,GV-35(F),
GV-41(F),GV-47(F),GV-50(F),GP-17(F),
GP-17(F),GP-16(F),GP-10(F),GV-49(F),
GV-46(F),GV-34B(F),GV-(F),GP-9(F),
GP-8(F),GP-15(F),GV-45(F),GV-38A(F),
GV-44(F),GP-7(F),GP-14(F),GP-2(F),
GP-6(F),GP-5(F),TE-37B(F),GP-1,
TE-28B(F),GP-4(F),GP-13(F),GP-12(F),
TE-22(F),TEB(F),TE-15B(F),TE-10B(F), GP-18A(F).
|
|
22
|
|
Parts of
Bhusaval,Muktainagar,Raver,Jalgaon,Yaval,Erandol,Amalner,
Chopda,PachoraTalukas. |
PTV(F),PT-13(F),PT,TE-1(F),TE-4(F),
TE-8(F),TE-9,TE-14,TE-13,TE-12(F),
TE-20,TE-27,TE-30,TE-31,TE-26(F),
TE-19(F),TE-31(F),TE-40,TE-42,TE-43, TE-48,TE-2,TE-3,TE-7,TE-11,TE-17,
TE-18,TE-25,TE-24,TE-41,TE-39,
TE-38,TE-29.
|
|
23
|
|
In parts of Sindhkhed,Sirpur,Shahada,Nandurbar,
Taloda Taluka.
|
TE-64,TE-76,TE-54,TE-63(F),TE-62,
TE-75(F),TE-74,TE-86.TE-85,TE-84(F),
TE-98,TE-111,TE-121(F),NR-120,
TE-133(R),TE-141,TE-134,TE-122,TE-123, TE-99,TE-113,TE-114,TE-101.
|
|
24
|
|
Junner. |
BM-4,GV-14(F),BM-5.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Urban Places
identified for Artificial Recharge to Ground Water through Rainwater
Harvesting in Maharashtra.
|
Sr. No.
|
District
|
No. of Towns
|
Name of the towns
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
Parts of Gr. Mumbai
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
Dhahanu and Talashri
|
|
3
|
|
1
|
Poladpur
|
|
4
|
|
7
|
Ratnagiri, Dapoli, Khed, Chiplun, Lanja, Sangmeshwar & Rajapur.
|
|
5
|
|
7
|
Kudal, Devgarh, Kankivili, Vaibhavwadi, Malvan, Vangurla
and Savantwadi.
|
|
6
|
|
10
|
Nasik, Dindori, Kalwan, Baglan, Niphad, Nandgaon,
Chandori, Yeola
Malegaon and Sinnar.
|
|
7
|
|
10
|
Jalgaon, Chopda, Yaval, Raver, Amalner, Edlabad,
Bhusawal,
Jamner, Chalishgaon, Bhadgaon
|
|
8
|
|
10
|
Dhule, Sakri, Navapur, Nandurbar Taloda,
Akkalkuwa, Dhadgaon,
Shahda, Shirpur, Sindkhed.
|
|
9
|
|
13
|
Ahmadnagar, Rahuri, Shrirampur, Nevasa, Shegaon,
Pathardi, Karjat
Jamkhed, Shrigonda, Parner, Akola, Sangamner and Kopargaon.
|
|
10
|
|
8
|
Aurangabad, Khultabad, Kannad, Soyagaon, Sillod, Paithan,
Gangapur, Vaijapur
|
|
11
|
|
6
|
Parts of Pune, Junnar, Shirur, Baramati, Indapur,
Baramati.
|
|
12
|
|
10
|
Solapur, Akkalkot, Mangelveda,
Pandharpur, Mohol, Madha, Karmala, Paranda, Barshi, Malsiras.
|
|
13
|
|
4
|
Siror, Shahuwadi, Gagan, vavda, Ajra
|
|
14
|
|
6
|
Sangli, Tasgaon, Kavtha, Mahakal, jath Khanapur.
|
|
15
|
|
10
|
Parts of Satara, Javali, Mahabaleshwar, Khandala, Wai,
Koregaon,Phaltan, Man, Khatav, and Kanad.
|
|
16
|
|
5
|
Jalna, Ambad, Partur, Jafrabad, Bhokardan
|
|
17
|
|
6
|
Parbhani,Jintur,Hingoli, Basmat,Gangakhed and
Pathri.
|
|
18
|
|
5
|
Beed, Gevrai, Manjalgaon, Kaij, Patoda and Ashti.
|
|
19
|
|
7
|
Nanded, Hadgaon, Bhokar, Degloor, Prilloli, Mukhed & Parts of
Kandhar
|
|
20
|
|
6
|
Osmanabad,Kalamb, Bhoom, Paranda, Tulzapur &
Umarga.
|
|
21
|
|
5
|
Latur,Ahmadnagar,Udgir Nilangas, Ausa.
|
|
22
|
|
13
|
Parts of Amravati, Chikhaldara,
Achalpur,Morshi,Bhatkuli,Daryapur,
Anjangaon,Tiwsa,Chandur Rly. Nandgaon & Warad.
|
|
23
|
|
13
|
Akola, Barshitakli, Patur,Malegaon, manora, Manglurpir, Washim,Risod,
Balapur,Murtizapur,Telhara, Akot & Karanja.
|
|
24
|
|
11
|
Yavatmal, Babulgaon, Kalamb,
Ralegaon,Wani,Maregaon,Ghatangi, Digras,Mahagaon,Darwah,Neri.
|
|
25
|
|
12
|
Chikhli,Khamgaon,Shegaon,Nandura, Shegaon, Malkapur,Algaon,
Sangrampur, Mehkar,Deolgaon raja, Lonar & Motala.
|
|
26
|
|
12
|
Parts of Nagpur City, Narkhed,
Paraseon,Katol,Kalmeshwar,Saoner, Hingna,Umrer,Ramtek,Mouda, Bhivapur
& Parts of Kuhi.
|
|
27
|
|
7
|
Parts of Bhandara city, Pawni,Sakoli,
Goregaon,Deori, Arjuni Morgaon,
Mohadi & Gondia.
|
|
28
|
|
8
|
Wardha,Devli, Arvi, Karanja, Ashti, karanja, Selu and
Hinganghat.
|
|
29
|
|
9
|
Chandrapur, Mul,Rajura,Gondpimpri, Bhadravati, Warora,
Nagbhir, Chimur, Bhahampuri.
|
|
30
|
|
7
|
Gadchiroli, Aheri,Charmoshi, Dhanora, Armori & Kurkheda.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| Scheme on Artificial Recharge of
Ground Water through Dug Wells |
Top |
|
|
|
|
A State
Sector Scheme on artificial recharge of ground water through dug wells
has been announced by Government of India in view of the dwindling
ground water resources in the shallow aquifer system of hard rocks in
some of the States and the problems of ground water sustainability that are
faced by the farmers especially by the marginal and small farmers.
This scheme will be implemented over a period of three years.
The scheme aims at increasing the sustainability of dug wells during
lean period, improving the agricultural productivity, drinking water
availability, etc. and thus improving the quality of life of people in
the ground water starving areas. Chemical quality of ground water is
also expected to improve during this process and thus assures the
local people with availability of good quality of ground water. This
scheme is expected to bring awareness among the rural community
regarding the importance of artificial recharge to ground water and
the necessity that each farmer and each village has to contribute for
this gigantic task of rejuvenating the phreatic aquifer and thus
reactivating the old dug well system for extracting ground water for
irrigation.
The
marginal and small farmers, who are in possession of an irrigation dug
well, are given subsidy directly through their personal bank accounts
by Government of India. They are encouraged to construct an artificial
recharge structure near their irrigation wells and divert the rainfall
falling in their fields to pass through the recharge structure and
recharge the ground water through dug wells. Appropriate guidelines
are being provided by the concerned Ground Water Departments and Nodal Agencies
of concerned State Governments and Central Ground Water Board for implementation of
the scheme. State Level and District Level Committees are formed to
oversee the implementation of the Scheme. In
the State of Maharashtra, the scheme is being implemented in 31
Talukas of 11 Districts where the ground water development is more
than 70% of the available resource. The districts are Ahmadnagar,
Amravati, Buldhana, Jalgaon, Latur, Nagpur, Nashik, Osmanabad, Pune,
Sangli and Satara.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Watershed WR-2, Amravati District |
|
|
| |
|
The watershed WR-2 covers an area of about 488.7
sq. kms and is located in Warud taluka of Amravati district. This
watershed is underlain by basalts and represents a hard rock terrain.
The watershed covers 96 villages and due to over-exploitation of
ground water for orange cultivation, the water levels are declining
@ 0.20 m/year. Three percolation tanks and 10 cement plugs have been
constructed. |
|
|
| |
|
Percolation
Tanks
Three Percolation tanks at Manikpur, Benoda and Bhimdi with
gross storage capacity varying from 71 to 221. thousand cubic metres(TCM)
have been constructed. The recharge to ground water from percolation
tanks varied from 49 to 132 TCM during 1997-98. These tanks contained
water for 180 to 252 days. Around 60 to 120 ha of area downstream
of percolation tanks was benefited by the recharge from percolation
tanks. Around 1-4m, 4-9m, and 6-10m rise in water levels was observed
during 1997-98. A total of 298.4 TCM of additional recharge from these
three percolation tanks is capable of bringing about 60 ha of additional
land under assured irrigation in a year.
|

|
|

|
Cement Plugs
Ten cement plugs having
a storage capacity of 2.1 to 7.42 TCM have been constructed. The efficiency
of cement plugs varies from 81.1 to 97.5 %. In general 3 to 6 fillings
are observed during the monsoon and capacity utilisation of cement
plugs is at times up to 400 % of storage capacity. During 1997-98,
ten cement plugs recharged around 58.7 TCM to ground water which
brought an additional area of 11.7 ha under assured irrigation.
|
|
|
| |
Location of
Recharge Structures constructed In WR-2 Watershed, Warud Taluka, Amravati
District, Maharashtra.
|
|
| |
| SR.NO. |
NAME
OF THE RECHARGE STRUCTURE |
NO.OF
RECHARGE STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED |
LOCATION
OF RECHARGE
STRUCTURES
|
GROSS
STORAGE IN THOUSANDS CUBIC METRES |
AVERAGE
BENEFITED AREA BY EACH STRUCTURE IN HECTARE |
EFFICIENCY |
| 1 |
Percolation Tanks |
3 |
Manikpur
Benoda
Bhimdi
|
220.6
198.0
71.0
|
50-100 |
78-91% |
| 2 |
Cement Plugs
(Nallah Bunds)
|
10 |
Temburkheda I
Temburkheda II,
Malkhed
Loni I
Loni II
Sendurjanaghat I
Sendurjanaghat II
Alora
Benoda
Mamdapur
|
7.42
4.79
2.10
2.21
3.60
5.67
2.49
3.23
5.30
3.24 |
10 |
81-97.5% |
| 3 |
Under Ground Bandharas
(UGB) |
|
Peth Mangruli,Bahada, Nandgaon, Haturna
I&II |
Localised Impact |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Watershed TE-17, Jalgaon District |
|
|
| |
|
The watershed TE-17 covers an area of about 235
sq.kms and is located in Yaval taluka of Jalgaon district. This watershed
is underlain by alluvium and represents soft rock terrain. Due to
extensive banana cultivation, the ground water declines @ 1m/year.
A total of 10 recharge structures have been constructed and the details
are given in Table 2 below: |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Table -2: Location of Recharge Structures Constructed
in TE-17 Watershed, Yaval Talukka., Jalgaon District, Maharashtra.
|
|
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
NAME OF THE RECHARGE STRUCTURE
|
NO.OF RECHARGE STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED
|
LOCATION OF RECHARGE
STRUCTURES
|
STORAGE CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS CUBIC METRES
|
AVERAGE BENEFITED AREA BY EACH STRUCTURE
IN HECTARE
|
EFFICIENCY
|
|
1
|
Percolation Tank(PT)
|
3
|
Ichkeda
Haripura
Dongaon
|
45
12
11
|
200 to 300
|
95-97%
|
|
2
|
Conversion of VT into PT
|
2
|
Baghjira
Haripura
|
6
22
|
100 to 200
|
95-97%
|
|
3
|
Nallah diversion to utilise the existing capacity
of PT
|
1
|
Nagadevi
|
350
|
300 to 400
|
95-97%
|
|
4
|
Injection well
|
1
|
Dambhurni
|
Intake
Capacity 3000 to 5000 Liters/hrs.
|
1
|
95%
|
|
5
|
Recharge Shaft
|
2
|
Savkheda Nagjhira
|
1440
480 m3/day
(Recharge capacity)
|
3
|
95%
|
|
6
|
Dug well recharge
|
1
|
Giradgaon
|
(Rate recharged) 30,000 - 70,000
Liters/hrs.
|
3
|
95%
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
It was observed that the efficiency of percolation
tanks is up to 97% and the capacity utilisation due to repetitive
fillings in case of new percolation tanks constructed under this project
is around 140 to 450%. The area benefited ranges from 100-400 ha.
The two recharge shafts constructed at Savkheda and Nagjhira have
augmented around 23.60 TCM during 1997. It is observed that percolation
tanks are the most suitable surface structures in Bazada zone and
the recharge shafts are considered as most efficient schemes in deep
water table mountain front area. In watershed TE-17, about 605 TCM
can be conserved in surface structures benefiting more than 1000 hectares
of land. Among the sub-surface structures, recharge shafts and dug
well recharge techniques are cost affective. The injection well method
of recharging aquifer is comparatively expensive. |
|
|
| |
| Watershed TE-11, Jalgaon District |
|
|
| |
|
The watershed TE-11 in Yaval tahsil of Jalgaon
district covering 28 villages has an area of 371 sq.kms and falls
in Tapi River basin. The main water bearing formations are alluvium
as well as Talus and Scree deposits. A total of 10 recharge structures
have been constructed and the details are given in Table3: |
|
|
| |
Table 3 : Location of Recharge Structures Constructed
in TE-11 Watershed, Yaval Taluka, Jalgaon District.
|
|
| |
|
SR.NO.
|
NAME OF THE RECHARGE STRUCTURE
|
NO.OF RECHARGE STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED
|
LOCATION OF RECHARGE
STRUCTURES
|
STORAGE CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS CUBIC METRES
|
RECHARGE TO GROUND WATER IN
CUBIC METRES
|
|
1
|
Percolation Tank
|
5
|
Vadri
Sangvi
Dongarda I
Dongarda II
DongardaIII
|
98
71
32
25
58
|
11230
33360
6580
8850
28083
|
|
2
|
Recharge Shaft
|
5
|
Borkheda
Vadri
|
480 to 1440 m3 /day
(Recharge capacity)
|
3000 to 30,000
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
(a) Percolation tanks:
Five Percolation tanks at Wadri, Sangvi and Dongarda with gross
storage capacity varying from 71 to 98 TCM have been constructedand
were monitored during the first year of its completion. The catchment
areas of individual tanks varies from 0.425 to 4.273 sq.km. The combined
storage capacity of all five percolation tanks is 285.89 TCM. The
recharge to ground water from percolation tanks varied from 6.580
to 28.083 TCM. The submergence areas of these tanks varies from 12.35
to 42.0 Th sq m. The cost-benefit ratio of these tanks varies between
1.12 and 2.30 |
|
|
| |
|
(b) Recharge Shafts: The water levels
of 42 observation wells, located around the five recharge shafts,
were monitored weekly from June to Dec. 01 and afterwards monitoring
was taken monthly upto March 02. The water levels in these wells ranged
between 23.20 and 100.00 m bgl. 21 wells have gone dry during March
2002. The period of water impounded were 79, 40 and 11 days for Borkheda
recharge Shaft. Wadri Circular II and Wadri Square II recharge shafts respectively. |
|
|
|
Ahmadnagar District
|
|
|
Hiware Bazaar
|
In the village of Hiware Bazaar, a
rain shadow area with an annual rainfall of 400 mm, the village community
has demonstrated the benefits of rain water harvesting, artificial recharge to ground water, conservation and management of ground
resources. Ground water levels have become shallow (4 to 6 m from ground
surface) even during summer season. Vegetation cover and soil
moisture have increased. As a result, socioeconomic condition of the
villagers has improved tremendously. The village panchayat has been
awarded with "National Water Award", for their excellent
work in enhancing the process of recharge to ground water
which has resulted in bringing a sea-change in the lives of the
villagers, for the year 2007 by the Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of
India.
|
 |
|
Contour
trenches along hill slope |
|
|
|
|
Nagpur District
|
|
|
Ramtek
 |
A demonstrative project
of roof-top rain water harvesting has been implemented by CGWB in
Kavikulguru Institute of Technology and Science (KITS), Ramtek,
Nagpur district. Roof-top area of 360 sq m of Information Technology
building has been used to harvest rain water and divert the same to
recharge ground water through an existing dug well in the premises
of the Institute. Rainfall from the roof of the building was
diverted through a system of pipes, silt settlement chamber with
overflow arrangement, on-line sand filter, flow meter, control valve
to the recharge well.
Analysis of water level data collected from the recharge well and an
observation bore well has indicated a substantial imporvement in
water level as well as the well yields in the area. As per
estimation, a total of 215.7 cu. m of rain was received on the roof
of the building, out of which 19 cu. m was actually recharged into
the ground water system through the dug well.
This project has been implemented to familiarise the Government,
Public Sector organisations, Industries, NGOs, voluntary
organisations, Academic Institutes, etc. with the field
demonstration of benefit of harvesting rain water on the building
roof-tops and helping in recharging the aquifers for meeting the
ever increasing demand for ground water.
|
|